"Of course not" you say. Really? Might want to think again.
Recently our beloved Attorney General, Eric Holder, justified the killing of U.S. citizens, he deemed to be a threat to the U.S., without due process. You can read about it
here. In that article this shit stick Holder is defending the killing of American-born al-Qaida operative Anwar al-Awlaki five months ago in Yemen. "BFD" you may say. Any dead terrorist is a good terrorist and one less rock throwing, wiping his ass with his hand baby killer can't be bad. Agreed. This Anwar fucker was a genuine douche bag of the highest order and the world is better off without him in it. Right now I really hope Hitler is fucking him in the ass with a pineapple.
But here is the bigger picture. This cat was an American. Period. And as an American he is/was entitled to due process. Instead he received a missile gram from Mongo. Again, "so the fuck what" you say? I'll tell yo so the fuck what. The devil is always in the details and here the details the devil is playing in lie in the definition of a "terrorist" and who the fuck gets to decide what and who that is. ESPECIALLY when we are talking about U.S. Citizens.
"Few things are as dangerous to American liberty as the proposition that the government should be able to kill citizens anywhere in the world on the basis of legal standards and evidence that are never submitted to a court, either before or after the fact," Shamsi said. "Anyone willing to trust President Obama with the power to secretly declare an American citizen an enemy of the state and order his extrajudicial killing should ask whether they would be willing to trust the next president with that dangerous power."
See where this can get tricky? "But DrSKA, he's only talking about the REALLY bad dudes what do bad things over there. Right?" Is he? Let's ask FBI director Robert Mueller
what he thinks about it.
Pressed by House lawmakers about a recent speech in which Holder described the legal justification for assassination, Mueller, who was attending a hearing on his agency's budget, did not say without qualification that the three criteria could not be applied inside the U.S. "I have to go back. Uh, I'm not certain whether that was addressed or not," Mueller said when asked by Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga., about a distinction between domestic and foreign targeting
Da FUCK!? Not sure? Might want to look into that Mr. Mueller. "Yeah, but 'they' are only talking bout the the REALLY bad people inside the U.S. Not just regular folks like you and me. Right?" Yeah. You just keep thinking that. Seems that the Department of Homeland Security, led by the HDIC (Head Dyke in Charge) Janet Napolitano, has been real busy making list and shit of who all should be watched and labeled as
"domestic extremist".
They cover: Jewish extremists, animal rights extremists, Christian identity extremists, black separatism extremists, anti-abortion extremists, anti-immigration extremists, anti-technology extremists, Cuban independence extremists and tax resistance extremists, to name a few.
"According to the document, for example, tax resistance extremists are people who "vehemently believe taxes violate their constitutional rights ... Members (of this group) have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals."
The top of the document also defines "alternative media" as something sinister -- though the term is commonly used to describe blogs and popular publications like New York's Village Voice.
"Alternative media" is "a term used to describe various information sources that provide a forum for interpretations of events and issues that differ radically from those presented in mass media products and outlets," the report says."
So does everybody see where we're going with this shit? Now we are saying that people who are proponents of tax reform and use the internet are "extremist" and "terrorist" and according to "they" it is okay for the government to just fucking kill you to death because of it. These people are going as far as saying our returning veterans are ripe for terrorist recruitment. SERIOUSLY! Read the damn article! Google it fuckers!
"Aw, c'mon now Dr. SKA. You're just being paranoid. That would never happen here." Really D-bags? REALLY?
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
He never thought it would happen to him either. Hitler that bitches.
And don't for a minute think that it is just the feds you have to worry about either. Seems DHS is spreading the love around to the
local level as well.
In the 62 cases reviewed, the subjects increasingly spoke out against the government, blamed the government for perceived problems and did so in a way that caught the attention of other people in their communities, according to the senior counterterrorism official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private White House event. Subjects became active on the Internet to espouse extremist views. And in some cases, the subjects purchased weapons, ammunition or explosive materials.
My my but don't we paint with a big ol' broad brush. So take heed my friends. Think this shit doesn't apply to you? Better think again. Remember. A thousand people let ten Nazi guards march them into the "showers" because they didn't think it applied to them either.
